Category: News | 0 comments
Posted by
Eric MetzeHere is an important note passed on from Davin Guinn:
Please alert the membership to an important recent Fifth Circuit opinion regarding 6th A Confrontation and 5th A Due Process called Kittelson v. Dretke, 04-20252, delv’d 9-20-05.
Mr. Kittelson was convicted of Indecency with a Child by contact and sentenced to 25 years out of Texas City. There was no physical evidence, confession or corroboration–just a swearing match. The Judge and the DA didn’t let the defense attorney cross (1) the complainant about a multitude of things, most importantly other allegations she’d made as well as a recantation of her accusation that he touched her (2) the cop who implied that not only had Kittelson messed with this kid but two others. Chief Judge King, Davis and a S.D. Dist. Judge issued an excellent 27 page opinion that everybody ought to read. It does a good job of summarizing basic, bedrock fundamental 6th A and 5th A law. It’s a two-cup-of-coffee/one good beer reader, but a must read in either event.
Here’s the case cite from Westlaw, courtesy of Joe Kline:
C.A.5 (Tex.),2005.
Kittelson v. Dretke
— F.3d —- 2005 WL 2278097 (5th Cir.(Tex.))
To download a copy of the case, click here.
Category: Official Notices | 0 comments
Posted by
Eric MetzeA little more than a week ago Chuck Lanehart wrote a letter to Matt Powell, Interim Criminal District Attorney, concerning problems with discovery. To read his letter, click here. To read Mr. Powell’s reply, click here.
Category: Official Notices, Resources | 0 comments
Posted by
Eric MetzeThis is a letter from Steven T. Henderson, Lubbock-Crosby County CSCD, encouraging members to attend an upcoming sentencing conference. Click here to read it.
Category: For Members, Prairie Dog Seminar | 0 comments
Posted by
Eric MetzeHere is a letter we received from Keith Hampton after his visit to Lubbock:
Pat and all: Thank you for having me up to Lubbock. Everyone was very kind, warm and generous (especially Phil who shuttled me to and from the airport and put me up for the night).
I have been doing various historical research (I’ve been on a sort of history kick of the Texas criminal defense variety) and found reference to the “Prairie Dog Lawyers” of the 19th century. I told Phil about it and he reminded me of your prairie dog mascot. So I went to the Barker History Center and copied the recollections of two lawyers published in an obscure historical review in 1929. I will be sending you the full piece (it is a fascinating look into the real practices of the day), but I couldn’t wait to tell you one fact gleaned from it: Sam Houston’s youngest son was a famous criminal defense lawyer! People tried to get him to become a DA, but the article says he liked representing the “culprits.”
I think this historical piece is the earliest published reference to the “Prairie Dog Lawyers” — but I’ll keep looking. I’m finding this historical research pretty addictive.
Keith
Category: Editorials | 0 comments
Posted by
Eric MetzeThis update, which was written by Keith Hampton, can be found here.