Next Meeting
December 18th at 5:30 p.m.
The Blue Light @ 1806 Buddy Holly

Federal Court Conflicts
November 30, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Judge Darnell has asked that I inform the defense bar of the following Lubbock County District Court policy regarding conflicts in federal court.

If a defense attorney has a jury trial scheduled in district court of Lubbock County and the attorney has a schedule conflict with a federal court plea or non-jury setting that cannot be re-scheduled, the Lubbock County district judges will postpone the start of trial or recess briefly for the attorney to attend to the federal matter. But the Lubbock County district judges, as a general rule, are opposed to re-setting a Lubbock jury trial setting for a conflicting federal plea or non-jury matter. However, Lubbock County district judges will defer to federal jury trials.

It is my understanding that exceptions to this policy will be granted on a case-by-case basis in consideration of the duration of the federal matter.

Chuck Lanehart, LCDLA Court Liaison

Seminar, Party
November 30, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

By now, you should have received:

1. A flyer for the 2007 LCDLA/TCDLA 27th Annual Prairie Dog Lawyers Advanced Criminal Law Seminar, to be held January 4th and 5th at Texas Tech University School of Law.

2. A letter containing four $25 tickets to the January 4th LCDLA annual membership party at Cagle’s Steaks, featuring a country BBQ dinner, and live musical entertainment by Mike Pritchard with Blue Thunder & The Lightning Horns.

If you have not already done so, please return your completed flyer to TCDLA for the seminar. If you have not received the flyer, you can also sign up via the TCDLA website.

Also, please send your $100 in to Dennis Reeves to pay for your party tickets. If you have not received your tickets, or if you need additional tickets, contact Dennis at 797-3720.

REMEMBER THAT PROCEEDS FROM THESE EVENTS BENEFIT THE BRENDAN MURRAY CRIMINAL DEFENSE SCHOLARSHIP AT TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW.

Second Chair Appointments on Capital Cases
November 28, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Judge Kelly Moore has requested that lawyers apply for second chair appointments on capital cases because only one lawyer in Lubbock county is on the list. Judge Moore has sent the forms which are located in the resources category in the members only section. Or, you can just click here: Indigent Defense Appointment Standards

Victory: Trey Poage, Stephen Dodd
November 28, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Congratulations to Trey Poage and Stephen Dodd! They won an acquittal in CCL#1 on a DWI B. The jury was out 50 minutes, and more than 30 minutes of that was to review the video. No breath test. The walk-and-turn test was bad, but was mitigated by testimony of a prior stroke suffered by the client and by the fact that the client was nearly 100 pounds overweight. Good job, gladiators!

Another Excellent Guest Editorial Against Campaign Ad
November 25, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Another excellent guest editorial appeared in today’s Lubbock Avalanche-Journal lambasting Lantroop’s stupid criminal defense lawyer-bashing ads. This time, it was by Arnold H. Loewy, George Killam Professor of Law at TTUSL. Check it out at:
http://www.lubbockonline.com/stories/112506/gue_112506019.shtml

Electronic Case Files
November 21, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Effective January 3, 2006, Judge Cummings will be ordering all civil and criminal cases to be designated to the Electronic Case Files System. If you are an attorney practicing in the U.S. District Court and are not already signed up as an ECF user, you are strongly encouraged to do so immediately. To sign up, go to the ECF page at http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/filing/ecf.html and complete the tutorial and registration form.

LCDLA members: click here for more information.

Intoxilyzer 5000 Challenged in Florida
November 18, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Ralph Brock has forwarded to the membership a very interesting article on the Intoxilyzer 5000. You can find the article in the Member’s Only Section under Resources. Check it out!

Dean Huffman Speaks Out Against Campaign Ad
November 18, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Dean Walt Huffman had a great column in today’s Lubbock A-J on the issue of Lantroop’s criminal defense lawyer-bashing campaign ads. Go to Lubbockonline.com or click the following link:
http://www.lubbockonline.com/stories/111806/gue_111806029.shtml

David Bass Update
November 11, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Dear LCDLA Members:

I recently heard from former LCDLA member/humorist David Bass, who left the Hub City about 15 years ago to become a roving Parrot-head/windmill-tilter. (David and wife Marge are pictured at the 1987 Bar Chili Cookoff in the attachment.) He is now in Tampa doing God’s work. After I updated David on LCDLA’s recent success, and after having a look at our new website (lcdla.org - check it out!), he is joining as an honorary LCDLA member, dues paid and everything!

The following is the state of David’s current world:

“After a long stretch trying cases in the Public Defender’s office here in Tampa (and taking a little time off to travel around) I am working in a state agency we have here called the Capital Collateral Regional Counsel - Middle District of Florida. After a capital murder trial and sentence of death an automatic appeal is taken directly to the Florida Supreme Court (bypassing our intermediate court of appeals). If the conviction and sentence are affirmed and the US Supreme Court denies cert, our office is then assigned for the post conviction work. This involves ineffective assistance of counsel claims, Brady/Giglio claims, and anything else that is not in the record. We hire our own doctors/crime scene experts/DNA testers/firearms expert and other experts to give the case a fresh look. We keep the case through the federal habeas track if the state courts give no relief. Our office has 15 lawyers, 13 investigators and support staff. Our cases come from convictions in the middle third of the counties in the state.

“In the last case I was assigned the murder happened in Feb 1999; the trial concluded September 2001; and the Florida Supreme Court opinion was dated December 2004. This is a pretty normal turnaround in these cases. (A normal felony case that happened in February of 1999 would have been in front of a jury by August 1999. There is a very strict Speedy Trial rule here.)

“Oldest case in the office? The murder happened in July 1976. It’s a case of actual innocence. We are still fighting it. It initially made it to the US Supreme Court and back and has had three sentencings. We are fighting the last affirmance. A hearing on it next week in Orlando, by the way.

“There is another CCRC office in Ft. Lauderdale that handles the southern part of Florida. It is similarly staffed. In the Northern District of Florida, post-conviction cases are handled by way of something called ‘the registry’. These are private lawyers who meet certain minimum criteria to handle capital cases and get paid a flat fee of (I think) $20,000 per case. It is billed on an hourly basis, so once the $20,000 is reached, some feel that the private lawyer stops working diligently. Lots of local politics involved.

“You probably know about this website - www.deathpenaltyinfo.org - it is a wealth of background, statistics and current events on the subject.

“If you are really into it, you can watch Florida Supreme Court oral arguments on the web at www.floridasupremecourt.org. Just follow the prompts. Upcoming highlights - on December 2 a lawyer in our office will argue an innocence claim in a DNA case. Barry Scheck was brought in by our office and will argue as well. Check it out. (If you miss it on the 2nd you can see it in the archives later.)

“Please give my regards to the membership. Let me know if I can be of any assistance if anyone finds themselves in the Sunshine State on law business . . . or monkey business.” – David Bass

Chuck Lanehart, LCDLA Liaison

Victory: Chuck Lanehart
November 7, 2006

Posted by Eric Metze

Chuck Lanehart had a win today in 140th District Court. Judge Darnell issued his order dismissing today in a contested forgery MPAG hearing held in September. The basis of the MPAG was a domestic violence assault arising out of a divorce — Judge found the complainant’s testimony incredible. Judge Parker made the same determination in May when she dismissed the protective order arising from the same incident. It remains to be seen if the underlying domestic violence assault case meets the same fate in CCAL#1. Good job, Chuck!

(); ?>